This short note generated some interesting discussion among the community, with as one could expect slightly more support from the "WG2/WG3" community than from the "WG1" community.

I am happy to accept this contribution to the ESD Ideas. I would suggest the author to make minor changes in his submissions as follow:
1) amend the introduction given that the WG1 LA1 meeting has happened now.
2) as suggested by Hallegate (and already discussed in the author's response), may be not put to much weight on likelihood as probably very hard to quantify.
3) as suggested by Forster, not to forget "the bottom part of the pdf". I sympathize with the authors seeing higher than expected impact as more important, but one could argue that a much lower than expected climate response, even if "highly unlikely", could have profound impact on the global economy, energy production, etc. It would be up to the IPCC authors/delegates to decide which of these high risk/low probability event should be discussed and potentially mentioned in the SPM.
4) I see that the author also wrote an additional short note on Physically Plausible High Impact Scenarios (PPHIS). I would suggest to include some of this material (such as the 3 examples) in the original submission.

I'm pleased to accept this revised version.