Articles | Volume 8, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-235-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-235-2017
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
10 Apr 2017
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 10 Apr 2017

Accounting for the climate–carbon feedback in emission metrics

Thomas Gasser, Glen P. Peters, Jan S. Fuglestvedt, William J. Collins, Drew T. Shindell, and Philippe Ciais

Viewed

Total article views: 8,813 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
6,292 2,280 241 8,813 158 202
  • HTML: 6,292
  • PDF: 2,280
  • XML: 241
  • Total: 8,813
  • BibTeX: 158
  • EndNote: 202
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Nov 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Nov 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 8,813 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 8,265 with geography defined and 548 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Emission metrics such as GWP or GTP are used to put non-CO2 species on a CO2-equivalent scale. In the fifth IPCC report the metrics are inconsistent, as the climate–carbon feedback is included only for CO2 but not for non-CO2 species. Here, we simulate a new impulse response function for the feedback, and we use it to correct the metrics. For instance, 1 g of CH4 is equivalent to 31 g of CO2 (instead of 28 g) following the corrected GWP100 metric. It is 34 g if other factors are also updated.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint