Articles | Volume 7, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-597-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-7-597-2016
Peer-reviewed comment
 | 
13 Jul 2016
Peer-reviewed comment |  | 13 Jul 2016

Comment on "Scaling regimes and linear/nonlinear responses of last millennium climate to volcanic and solar forcing" by S. Lovejoy and C. Varotsos (2016)

Kristoffer Rypdal and Martin Rypdal

Viewed

Total article views: 2,656 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,717 834 105 2,656 133 134
  • HTML: 1,717
  • PDF: 834
  • XML: 105
  • Total: 2,656
  • BibTeX: 133
  • EndNote: 134
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Mar 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Mar 2016)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 24 Apr 2024
Short summary
This comment on the paper by Lovejoy and Varotsos demonstrates that their methods for establishing nonlinearity in the global temperature response in climate models are flawed. One of their methods is based on an invalid approximation, which when corrected does not falsify the hypothesis that the response is linear. This conclusion is enforced when internal variability in the models are accounted for. The other results in their paper are also shown to be reproduced by linear-response models.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint