Socio-environmental cooperation and conflict? A discursive understanding and its application to the case of Israel and Palestine

Ide, T.; Fröhlich, C.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-659-2015

Articles | Volume 6, issue 2

https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-659-2015

© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue:

Climate, land use, and conflict in Africa

https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-6-659-2015

© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 6, issue 2

Research article

|

13 Oct 2015

Research article |

| 13 Oct 2015

Socio-environmental cooperation and conflict? A discursive understanding and its application to the case of Israel and Palestine

T. Ide and C. Fröhlich

Download

Final revised paper (published on 13 Oct 2015)
Preprint (discussion started on 22 May 2015)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC C402: 'Innovative article, minor revisions on methods and level of analysis', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jun 2015
RC C453: 'Interactive comment on “Socio-environmental cooperation and conflict? A discursive understanding and its application to the case of Israel/Palestine” by T. Ide and C. Fröhlich', Janine Romero, 31 Jul 2015
AC C491: 'Final response to the reviewers', Tobias Ide, 17 Aug 2015

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Svenja Lange on behalf of the Authors (18 Aug 2015) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (20 Sep 2015) by Jasmin Link

Short summary

We investigate why some social groups engage in conflicts over shared natural resources while other groups cooperate over the same issue. Drawing on evidence from the particularly puzzling case of water conflict and cooperation in Israel and Palestine, we show that the discursive construction of identities and situation assessments is a crucial explanatory factor. This finding highlights the relevance of bottom-up discursive conflict transformation.